Posts Tagged ‘persuade’

Is The Logic Part Of The Negotiation Process A Good Thing Or A Bad Thing?

Friday, November 18th, 2011
Image Credit When logic is involved, you have to carefully plan your next move…

When logic is involved, you have to carefully plan your next move…

A negotiation is very much like a dance, you make a move and then your move forces the other side to make a move. Once they’ve done that, then their actions force you to take some corresponding action and so on. There is a logic to all of this and where things get interesting is when we start to try to figure out if the role that logic plays is working for us or against us…

Why Logic In A Negotiation Can Be A Bad Thing

Logic – a bad thing? Who would dare to say something like that? It turns out that I would and the reason that I would is pretty simple. If you’ve ever been in a negotiating situation where the other side started to use logic to support their position, you know what I mean.

/p>When you are faced with a negotiating opponent who is prepared and equipped to use logic as one of their negotiation styles, then you’ve got a problem. Negotiations can be difficult enough without having to deal with this kind of challenge.

The reason that you can run into problems when you are confronted with lots of logic during a negotiation is because the other side now has a way to guide you to a conclusion using their logic.

What’s going to happen here is that the other side will make a request and then use logic to explain why they are making the request. It will seem like a reasonable request to you. They will then make another request that flows from the first. Once again they’ll provide the logic that is needed to support this request also.

What will happen here is that you’ll find yourself starting to be guided by the logic of their requests. Before you know what is happening, you’ll be agreeing to their requests and going along with them. The other side will have been able to use logic to gain the advantage in the negotiation and they will now be able to move you towards creating the type of deal that they want.

Why Logic In A Negotiation Can Be A Good Thing

Clearly logic can be a bad thing if the other side starts to use it against you. However, is it possible that logic could be a powerful tool if it was in your hands?

The answer is, of course, yes. In any principled negotiation you should plan on using logic as one of your tools. The trick to getting the most out of logic as a tool is that you need to be able to prepare to use it in a negotiation before the negotiations begin.

I tend to believe that logic should be included in any negotiation definition. The reason is that as you are planning how you want your next negotiation to proceed, creating a sequence of arguments based on logic can provide you with the negotiating framework that can help you to close a deal.

What you are going to want to do is to include logic in your preparation for the negotiation. This means that you’ll need to lay out a sequence of proposals that you’ll want to make of the other side. You’ll then have to create a logical framework for why you are making that proposal. Your goal will be to get the other side of the table to agree to your proposal based on your logic.

If you can do this, then your next proposal should be based off of the agreement that you’ve been able to reach on the first proposal. By doing this you can use logic to guide the other side to the conclusion that you want to reach. Once they start to agree with you, logic will make it very difficult for them to stop agreeing!

What All Of This Means For You

Negotiating can be hard work. We’ve all been taught that logic is a good thing and so as a negotiator you’d think that using logic as a part of your negotiating techniques could only be a good thing, right?

It turns out that logic is a slippery beast. During a negotiation if the other side of the table starts to use logic against you, you may quickly find yourself in trouble. The reason for this is that logic is a well-defined series of conclusions that may lead you to a result that is not what you wanted to get out of the negotiations. On the other hand, if you construct a series of logical arguments that support your position, the other side may find it hard to object to your requests.

Logic is a powerful tool. The next time that you are in a negotiation make sure that you keep your eyes open in order to quickly determine if the other side is preparing to use logic against you. No matter what they do, you should always be ready to use logic to support your negotiating positions.

- Dr. Jim Anderson
Blue Elephant Consulting –
Your Source For Real World Negotiating Skills™

Question For You: How much time do you think that it’s worth spending creating a set of logical arguments to use during your next negotiation?

Click here to get automatic updates when The Accidental Negotiator Blog is updated.

P.S.: Free subscriptions to The Accidental Negotiator Newsletter are now available. Learn what you need to know to do the job. Subscribe now: Click Here!

What We’ll Be Talking About Next Time

Magical mind control powers. That’s what every sales negotiator would like to have. The ability to bend the other side of the table’s mind to your way of thinking would be the set of negotiation styles or negotiating techniques that would make life so much easier. Sadly, I don’t believe that such powers exist. However, there is something that comes pretty close – standards.

Both Win: How To Negotiate A Better Deal For Both Parties

Thursday, September 25th, 2008
The Cooperative Mode Of Negotiating Helps Create Both-Win Results

The Cooperative Mode Of Negotiating Helps Create Both-Win Results

The phrase “win-win” is looking pretty ragged along about now. How about if we talk about the much more meaningful “both win” strategy for negotiating?

The key to creating a successful both-win negotiation is to remember that at its heart, negotiation is all about sharing value between both parties. If it was as simple as that, we really wouldn’t need this blog! However, as human beings we often use one of two different approaches when we enter into a negotiation: competitive mode or cooperative mode. Can you guess which mode most of us enter a negotiation with?

When we are in the competitive mode, we focus on who is currently getting how much of the pie. When we are in the cooperative mode, we focus on trying to make the pie larger so that everyone will walk away with more. Clearly the cooperative mode is the route to creating a both-win deal for both parties.

So all of this discussion leads to the big discussion: how can we go about creating a both-win deal when we always seem to start out in competitive mode? The answer is that we need to start asking ourselves the right types of questions. Specifically, we need to ask the questions that will allow us to find out what things can be changed that will allow both sides of the table’s interests better. A good example of how to do this is when you start to talk about schedules for what you are negotiating. If you can either receive or deliver the thing that is being negotiated earlier, later, or maybe all at one time or even in parts then all of a sudden there is additional value to share with both parties.

One additional way to cause this shift in negotiating modes to occur is to find a way to communicate to the other side of the table that you really WANT to reach an agreement with them, not that you HAVE to. Doing this and helping them feel good about it will go a long way towards allowing you to reach your negotiating goals.

If you are able to shift the negotiation from the competitive mode to the cooperative mode, then you will have greatly improved your chances of reaching a negotiated agreement. It’s not always easy to do, but I think that you’ll find the results well worth the effort.

What mode do you start your negotiations in: competitive or cooperative? Do you try to shift modes during the negotiation? Have you ever been able to do this successfully? How did the negotiation turn out? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.