Posts Tagged ‘authority’

No Authority / Full Authority Sales Negotiations

Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009
Lacking Authority Can Leave Sales Professionals Feeling Naked In A Negotiation

Lacking Authority Can Leave Sales Professionals Feeling Naked In A Negotiation

Sales professionals really don’t like to enter into a negotiation naked. When you don’t have any authority to make concessions, you basically feel pretty naked.  Likewise, if you have full authority, then you’ve got a whole other set of problems.

Back to the poor sales negotiator who has no authority. Hold on a minute, they actually do have a lot of authority. Here’s what they have:

  • the authority to collect information and represent the other side of the table back within his organization.
  • the authority to attempt to create a “both win” type of negotiation.
  • the authority to establish both support and commitment with the other side of the table.
  • the authority to deal with different members of his organization in the role of a specialist.
  • the authority to try to reach a deal on a personal level.

The sales professional is really only prevented from giving in to any of the other side’s demands. Since he / she still has the ability to negotiate, it’s worth the effort because there is the possibility that the other side will make concessions and a deal can be struck, or at least valuable information about the other side will be collected.

If you’ve ever been in a no authority sales negotiation situation, then you’ve probably dreamed of having the ability of being in a sales negotiation where you had full authority. Careful what you wish for – this isn’t all that it’s cracked up to be.

The reason that full authority is not necessarily what you either want or need is because the name is actually misleading. Full authority simply means that whatever you agree to is what your  side of the table will end up having to do. This can lead to disaster. Here are some reasons why you might not want to have full authority when you enter a negotiation:

  1. Both sides of the table may not have equal authority.
  2. Both sides of the table may differ in stamina or physical qualities.
  3. Either side may not be properly prepared.
  4. Either side may be role playing.
  5. A side may be more secure than the other.
  6. A side may be busier than the other.
  7. A side might be more wealthy than the other.
  8. A side might be more emotionally involved than the other.
  9. Either side may have better support staff.

Should you find yourself in a sales negotiation with full authority, all is not lost. There are several ways that you can get out of this predicament. Here are a couple of suggestions:

  • Say that you are not familiar with how things operate.
  • Indicate that you will need to check with the board of directors.
  • State that there is a legal problem.
  • State that you need to check with a government agency.
  • Say that this may involve anti-trust issues.
  • Indicate that this deal actually depends on another deal that is currently being negotiated separately.
  • State that you have to tell your coworker / partner.

If none of these “escape” techniques work for you, you can always fall back on the old reliable – “I don’t know”. You may feel foolish for saying it, but at least you won’t end up negotiating a bad deal.

Have you ever entered into a negotiation with no ability to make concessions? How did you feel? How did that negotiation turn out? Have you ever had full authority in a negotiation? How did that turn out? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in authority | No Comments »

Sales Negotiators Should Always Have Limited Authority – Or Else!

Tuesday, February 24th, 2009

Sales Negotiators Who Have Authority Limits Can Use This To Their Advantage

Sales Negotiators Who Have Authority Limits Can Use This To Their Advantage

Do you run the world yet? I’m going to guess that the answer is no (if it isn’t, then we need to talk). When we talk about being successful in a sales negotiation, we often spend a lot of time trying to figure out how we can get more negotiating power on our side. However, sometimes NOT having negotiating power can work to our benefit…

If you are in charge, then the other side can always pressure you to make a decision because they know that you are the ultimate decision making authority. However, if you don’t have the ability to make the final decision, if you instead have limited authority, then there can be a number of benefits:

  1. Gives you the ability to say no gracefully if needed.
  2. Gives you room to back off and assess your position.
  3. Give you the ability to go check with experts.
  4. Give you the right to review the evidence.
  5. Give you the ability to take the time to look for mistakes.
  6. Gives you the time that you need to read the fine print.
  7. Gives you the ability to bring up undefined questions.
  8. Gives you the ability to write a better argument.
  9. Gives you the right to coordinate the decision.
  10. Gives you the ability to move the negotiation away from an unacceptable position.

As you can see from this list, what some would see as disadvantages during a negotiation can also be seen as advantages. Keep in mind that it’s really how you make use of something that determines if it is an advantage or a disadvantage.

The negotiation experts are often split when it comes to what types of limits on authority are more valuable than others. However, Dr. Karrass believes that  the best kind of limits on your authority are statutory or administrative limits. The other side will quickly understand that you are faced with these types of limits and in fact may enter the negations with the expectations that you have these limits.

Next in line comes dollar limits (managers can sign off on so much, Directors so much more, and VPs even more). The other side may be least receptive to hearing that you are dealing with people limits because these often seem to be things that you should be able to work through.

One thing that you are going to have to keep in mind is just how willing the other side is going to be to deal with you despite the limits on your authority. You may find that corporate policy limits are the ones that cause the most problems during a negotiation because they can be the most difficult limits to either change or circumvent.

There are a great number of different types of authority limits that you may be faced with during any given negotiation. The specific details of the negotiation will define the limits that are placed on you. No matter what limits are present, they can generally be placed in one or more common “buckets”:

  • Money limits
  • Term limits
  • Policy limits
  • Legal limits
  • Design limits
  • Group approval limits

In the end, when you find yourself in a negotiation with a number of limits placed on you, take a moment to understand how you can use these limits to boost your negotiating power.

Have you entered a sales negotiation with limits on your authority? Did you see this as a disadvantage or as an advantage? How did that negotiation turn out? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in power | No Comments »

Every Negotiation Needs A Rap(port) Star!

Tuesday, December 16th, 2008
Establishing Rapport With The Other Side Is Music To Everyone's Ears

Establishing Rapport With The Other Side Is Music To Everyone

So here’s something that will blow your mind: studies have shown that car shopping customers are willing to pay between $200 and $300 MORE for a car if during the negotiation process they became convinced that the salesperson was committed to their satisfaction.

Wow – talk about a successful negotiation for the salesperson. But wait, isn’t the customer the customer getting something out of this also – satisfaction. Think back over all of those deals in which you have been the customer and in which you walked away afterwards feeling less than satisfied. Perhaps nobody is getting taken for a ride here (sorry for the pun).

It’s possible that the customer side in this type of deal can actually put a value on being made to feel satisfied: $200-$300. Hmm, if it’s true when people are buying cars, just imagine what feeling satisfied must be worth when you are working on a much larger deal!

All this comes down to one thing: part of the price that is being negotiated is friendship and goodwill. Angry, bitter, combative negotiators will get beaten down on price each and every time. In all business negotiations we must remember that we are negotiating not only things (goods and services), but also attitudes.

As the car buying study shows, part of the price of any deal that you negotiate will include:

  1. Trust: does the other side trust that you have been straight with them and that you will keep your word after the deal is signed?
  2. Friendship: yes, friendship does still exist in the 21st Century. Does the other side believe that they have developed a relationship with you that will continue to exist after the negotiations are completed?
  3. Integrity: would you do something that you knew was wrong? Would you sell a product or a service that you knew was flawed or wasn’t going to meet a customer’s needs?
  4. Goodwill: do you have that intangible asset that makes the other side believe that you will do them no harm?
  5. Credibility: does your track record support what you are saying?
  6. Authority: do you really have the ability to deliver all that you have promised?
  7. Status: are you the peer or the better of the other side – are you the right one for them to be negotiating with?

It’s important to note that there is a HUGE difference between establishing rapport (a connection) with the other side vs. just being cooperative. Experiments have shown that when the other side is exploitative, they can easily take advantage of cooperative negotiators.

So where does all of this lead to? It’s as simple as realizing that compatible attitudes between both sides of the negotiating table are needed in order to be able to reach solid, long-lasting agreements. In the end, there is no way that either side can trust what the other side has promised if the two sides can’t trust each other.

Although they may not be listed on the list of bargaining points that you drew up before the negotiations started, everything that we’ve discussed including recognition, friendship, and trust are always items that are up for negotiation. It’s well worth the extra time that it takes to make sure both sides walk way mutually satisfied.

Have you ever negotiated a deal and then left unsatisfied? How much would you have paid to have been satisfied? Have you ever formed a lasting friendship with the other side during a negotiation? How important is trust to you when you are negotiating with someone? Leave me a comment and let me know what you are thinking.

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Posted in satisfaction | 1 Comment »